Top 10 Coding Interview Platforms in 2025

Hello there! I’m excited to share my deep dive into the world of Coding Interview Platforms as we head into 2025. Over the past few months, I’ve spoken with numerous (20 to be exact) tech recruiters, hiring managers, and engineers to learn what makes a coding interview tool truly effective. In this blog post, I’ll share everything I’ve learned from testing these platforms, along with my personal experiences, and finally, my top 10 recommendations for the best coding interview platforms available in 2025.

In today’s fast-paced tech world, companies need a tool “that just work” and a candidate-friendly interview process to attract top talent. With remote work now a permanent part of our lives, reliable hiring tools are more critical than ever. Whether you’re screening new grads or seasoned professionals, the right interview platform can truly make the difference when it comes to accurately and fairly assessing a candidate’s skills.

Key Takeaways

• Interviewers Prioritize Experience: Tech recruiters and engineers are looking for platforms that offer features like real-time collaboration, code completion, and multi-language support.
• A Perfect Interview Tool Has Multiple Capabilities: Our research and interviews with 20 tech interviewers reveal that capabilities such as cheating prevention, a comprehensive question library, and smooth real-time code pairing are essential.
• Ease of Use is Critical: Candidates need an environment that mimics their everyday coding setup, which is why I have valued platforms that integrate online code editors for interviews and feel natural from the start.
• Value Beyond Code Compilation: The best platforms aren’t just about compiling code; they also evaluate problem-solving skills with inbuilt test cases, interactive whiteboard, and a great user interface.
• Cost Matters: Many companies are also looking for free coding assessment platform options that still deliver features discussed above. However, it’s like finding a unicorn.

What Makes the Best Coding Interview Platforms?

We interviewed 20 tech-interviewers to understand what matters most during technical interviews. Based on our extensive research, here are the essential capabilities that they would want in the coding interview platform of their choice:

Capability	Description
Real-Time Collaboration	Enables both interviewer and candidate to work together on code in real time, with visible cursors.
Multi-Language Support	Supports various programming languages so that candidates can use their preferred language.
Auto-Completion & Syntax Help	Provides IDE-like features such as auto-complete, auto-indentation, and also highlights the error.
Integrated Testing Environment	Allows test case execution within the platform to assess code correctness immediately.
Cheating Prevention Mechanisms	Features like tab-switch detection, secure copy-paste restrictions, and webcam monitoring ensure integrity.
Comprehensive Question Library	Offers a rich repository of coding problems which can be filtered further by difficulty, topic, and language.
User-Friendly Interface	An intuitive design that minimizes distractions and replicates a candidate’s natural coding environment.
Integration with Hiring Tools	Easily integrates with applicant tracking systems and HR tools for smooth hiring workflow.

As you can see, a strong Coding Interview Platform needs a lot of functionalities with an intuitive user experience. When these capabilities are in one place, interviewers can better assess technical skills while offering a smooth experience for candidates.

I was pleasantly surprised by how much innovation there is in real-time collaboration. Gone are the days when an online coding environment was just a simple text box; now, it’s an interactive, dynamic space that closely mirrors your favorite local IDE.

Customization is also key. Every company has its way of interviewing. So, the ability to tailor the platform to your specific needs is paramount. Many solutions truly shine by allowing you to have your own question libraries and set up real-world/on-the-job coding challenges that give you deep insight into a candidate’s thought process.

How We Evaluate and Test Platforms

When it comes to evaluating these platforms, I take a very hands-on approach. I have invested a significant time testing every feature that matters in a live coding interview. From real-time collaboration to auto-complete and syntax highlighting, every aspect is scrutinized to ensure the platform delivers a seamless and reliable experience. 

Beyond the technical capabilities, I have also consider the overall user experience. How intuitive is the interface? How fast it loads? Does it truly mirror the natural environment that candidates are used to in their own IDEs?

Integration is another crucial factor. A great online coding interview platform should work effortlessly with your existing ATS, calendar tools, and HR systems. I evaluate how well platforms allow for custom interview setups and support various formats, including live coding and system design sessions.

Proctoring and cheating prevention are equally important. In today’s digital landscape, a robust platform must include features like tab-switch detection, copy-paste checks, and webcam integration to ensure candidates are coding independently and honestly.

Benefits of Using a Coding Interview Platform

Using a dedicated Coding Interview Platform can dramatically improve the candidate experience by offering a secure, intuitive, and engaging environment. 

Modern tools replace outdated text editors and unreliable video calls with seamless, real-time code evaluation and collaboration. This enables candidates to comfortably demonstrate their coding abilities under realistic conditions.

Some of these platforms also streamline the interview process by automating tasks like test case validation, feedback collection, and performance reporting. Detailed analytics and real-time collaboration features let interviewers focus on assessing technical skills and problem-solving rather than troubleshooting technical issues, saving time and reducing administrative overhead.

Here are the Top 10 Platforms

After extensive research and testing, here are the top 10 coding interview platforms for 2025. Each one offers a unique blend of features and capabilities to help you conduct more effective interviews.

1. HunchVue (The Obvious Choice for Coding Interviews)

Pros:

• Real-Time Collaboration: Facilitates seamless pair-programming with precise text cursor tracking, enabling interviewers and candidates to code together effectively.
• Multi-Language Support: Offers compiler support for over 35 programming languages, accommodating diverse coding preferences.
• Integrated Tools: Combines video conferencing, a digital whiteboard, and live chat within the platform, providing a comprehensive interview environment.
• Interview Playback: Provides instant access to video and coding playback of the interview, allowing for detailed session reviews.
• Proctoring Alerts: Implements advanced proctoring alerts to ensure a fair and secure interview environment.

Cons:

• Limited Free Plan: The free plan has a limit for 40 min for each session, which may not suffice for organizations with higher hiring needs.
• Learning Curve: Customizable setups may require initial familiarization to utilize all features effectively.
• Additional Costs: High-volume usage could lead to increased expenses beyond standard plans.

Description:

HunchVue, powered by HireHunch, is an innovative platform designed to streamline technical interviews.

A lot of tech interviewers were “managing” interviews via multiple tools setup, taking their focus away from the interviewing. That’s where HunchVue brings a collaborative coding environment with real-time code execution, integrated video conferencing, and a digital whiteboard all inside one product.

 

The platform supports over 35 programming languages, ensuring versatility in assessments. Features like interview playback and proctoring alerts enhance the evaluation process, making HunchVue a comprehensive solution for technical hiring.

Pricing:

• Limited Free Plan: The free plan has a limit for 40 min for each session, which may not suffice for organizations with higher hiring needs.
• Learning Curve: Customizable setups may require initial familiarization to utilize all features effectively.
• Additional Costs: High-volume usage could lead to increased expenses beyond standard plans.
  

2. CoderPad – Best Overall Coding Interview Platform

 

Pros:

• Real-time pair-programming with visible cursors.
• Supports over 99 programming languages and frameworks.
• Built-in video/audio and digital whiteboard for design challenges.
• Offers take-home projects and code playback for detailed review.
• Robust anti-cheating measures and customizable environments.

Cons:

• Free plan limited to 2 tests per month.
• Slight learning curve for custom setups.
• Additional sessions can increase costs for high-volume hiring.

Description:
CoderPad is a renowned technical interview platform celebrated for its live pair-programming capabilities that closely emulate a real-world IDE. It supports over 99 programming languages and frameworks to ensure candidates can work in the language they prefer. 

I’ve found that its intuitive interface and robust features make it a standout choice for technical interviews. Whether you’re running live pair-programming sessions or offering take-home challenges, CoderPad delivers a comprehensive and engaging experience for both interviewers and candidates.

In addition to its core functionalities, CoderPad includes features like code playback, allowing interviewers to review sessions in detail, and anti-cheating measures that maintain assessment integrity. Its customizable environment lets you align challenges with your team’s specific needs, making it a tool that not only evaluates technical skills but also mirrors the natural workflow of modern developers.

Pricing:

• Free Plan: 2 tests per month.
• Starter Plan: $100/month for 5 tests (additional tests at $25 each).
• Team Plan: $375/month for 30 tests (extra tests at $25 each).
• Custom Plan: Tailored pricing available.
  For the latest details, please check CoderPad’s official pricing page.

3. HackerRank – Best for Automated Assessments and Live Interviews

 

Pros:

• Offers automated technical assessments and live pair-programming via CodePair.
• Supports over 35 programming languages, catering to diverse technical roles.
• Robust enterprise features including advanced analytics and seamless ATS integrations.
• Extensive question library and skill development tools to prepare candidates effectively.

Cons:

• Higher-tier plans can be costly for smaller organizations.
• Additional assessment attempts add extra cost if usage exceeds plan limits.

Description:
HackerRank is a leading platform in the tech hiring arena, offering a comprehensive suite of tools for assessing technical talent. I appreciate its dual approach of automated coding tests and live pair-programming sessions via CodePair. This ensures candidates are evaluated on their real technical abilities, whether through online assessments or interactive interviews with video, audio, and chat features.

HackerRank’s extensive coding challenge library not only helps candidates prepare but also enables interviewers to gauge problem-solving skills across various domains like algorithms, data structures, and AI. With support for over 35 programming languages and strong enterprise integrations, HackerRank is versatile enough for organizations of all sizes.

Pricing:

• Starter Plan: $165 per month (billed annually at $1,990) for one user, with 120 assessment attempts per year; additional attempts at $15 each.
• Pro Plan: $375 per month (billed annually at $4,490), offering unlimited user access and 300 assessment attempts per year.
• Enterprise Plan: Custom pricing with advanced features for high-volume hiring.
  HackerRank’s robust feature set and flexible pricing make it a valuable tool for optimizing technical hiring.

 

4. CoderByte – Best for Customizable Challenges

 

Pros:

• Supports both live interviews and pre-set coding challenges.
• Automated grading and detailed performance reporting.
• Highly customizable templates to tailor challenges to your needs.
• Integrated video and audio tools for smooth communication.
• Extensive problem library with over 1,000 challenges and support for 30+ languages.

Cons:

• Some users may find the extensive features a bit overwhelming at first.
• Advanced customization options can require a learning curve.

Description:
CoderByte is a top choice for coding assessments and technical interviews, offering a robust suite of tools to evaluate technical talent. I love that it supports both live coding sessions and pre-set challenges, so you can pick the interview style that best fits your needs. Its automated grading and performance reporting give you immediate insights into a candidate’s skills, making data-driven hiring decisions much easier.

What sets CoderByte apart is its flexibility. With highly customizable templates, you can tailor each challenge to fit specific job requirements, ensuring assessments are both relevant and challenging. The integrated video and audio tools keep the interview flow natural, while the extensive problem library means you always have fresh content to choose from. Features like reference search and code playback further enhance the evaluation of a candidate’s thought process and problem-solving approach.

Pricing:

• Standard Plan: $199 per user/month, including automated grading, full library access, integrated interviews, and advanced cheating detection.
• Pay-per-Candidate Plan: $10 per candidate/year, ideal for organizations with variable hiring needs.
  For the most current details, check CoderByte’s official pricing page.

 

5. Codility – Best for Screening and CodeLive

 

Pros:

• Offers a collaborative CodeLive virtual whiteboard for real-time coding and system design interviews.
• Provides automated assessments with customizable test cases.
• Extensive language support with interactive feedback and detailed analytics.
• Strong proctoring features and an AI assistant to ensure assessment integrity.

Cons:

• Pricing can be steep for smaller teams on the Starter Plan.
• Some advanced features may require deeper setup and training.

Description:
Codility is a sophisticated platform built to streamline technical assessments, especially for tech-driven companies. Its standout feature, CodeLive, is an interactive virtual whiteboard that enables real-time coding and system design interviews. I found this collaborative space incredibly effective, especially with its robust proctoring tools like copy-paste tracking and tab-switch detection that help maintain integrity.

Besides live interviews, Codility’s CodeCheck automates assessments with customizable test cases, ensuring thorough evaluation of every candidate. Supporting multiple programming languages and offering detailed reporting, Codility provides comprehensive insights into technical abilities. The inclusion of an AI assistant further enhances the assessment experience, making Codility an excellent tool for both initial screenings and in-depth evaluations.

Pricing:

• Starter Plan: $1,200 annually for 120 invites per year, one platform user, unlimited collaborator users, basic proctoring, and access to a starter task library (1,200+ questions).
• Scale Plan: $500 monthly (or $5,000 annually with two months free) offering 25 invites per month, three platform users, and access to a core task library (1,800+ questions) with basic proctoring.
• Custom Plan: Tailored pricing with premium video proctoring, full task library access, enterprise integrations, and dedicated support.
  For the latest details, please consult Codility’s official pricing page.

 

6. HackerEarth – Best for AI-Based Behavioral Insights

 

Pros:

• Advanced FaceCode enables real-time pair programming with integrated video/audio.
• Provides in-depth AI-based behavioral insights to analyze problem-solving approaches.
• Supports a wide array of 41 programming languages for diverse technical roles.
• Automated summaries and interactive features like diagram boards and interview playback enhance evaluation.

Cons:

• The platform’s advanced features may require extra training for new users.
• Pricing can be on the higher side, especially for enterprise-level plans.

Description:
HackerEarth is a comprehensive platform that takes coding assessments to the next level by incorporating advanced AI-based behavioral insights. Its FaceCode feature for pair programming is a game-changer—allowing interviewers to interact with candidates in real time while gaining deep insights into their problem-solving behavior through AI analytics. I’ve found that this approach really brings out a candidate’s true potential.

Supporting 41 programming languages, HackerEarth is versatile enough for many technical roles. The platform also provides detailed interview summaries and interactive features like diagram boards for system design and interview playback for thorough post-interview reviews. These functionalities make HackerEarth a robust tool for organizations looking to improve their technical hiring with AI-enhanced insights.

Pricing:

• Startup Plan: $119 per user/month, including test creation, a basic question library, candidate invites, detailed reports, and basic proctoring settings.
• Enterprise Plan: $279 per user/month, offering additional features such as question pooling, white-labeling, bulk MCQ uploads, code playback, API access, and advanced proctoring settings.
• Custom Plan: Tailored pricing with premium features such as a full question library, third-party ATS integrations, dedicated account managers, and priority support.
  For the most current pricing details, please consult HackerEarth’s official pricing page.

 

7. CodeInterview – Best for Live Collaborative Coding

 

Pros:

• Real-time collaborative editor with support for over 30 languages.
• Replay options allow for a thorough review of candidate coding sessions.
• Integrated high-definition audio/video ensures seamless communication.
• Minimalist, distraction-free interface enhances focus on coding tasks.

Cons:

• Some users might find customization options limited compared to more feature-heavy platforms.
• May require a reliable internet connection to fully utilize real-time collaboration features.

Description:
CodeInterview is specifically designed for live coding interviews, focusing on real-time collaboration and an intuitive user experience. I appreciate how its collaborative editor supports over 30 programming languages, making it versatile enough for a range of technical assessments. The replay option is a particularly useful feature, letting you review a candidate’s coding session in detail to better understand their approach.

With integrated high-definition audio and video, CodeInterview ensures clear communication between interviewer and candidate. Its minimalist design keeps distractions at bay, allowing candidates to focus solely on solving the problem. Whether you’re conducting a live coding test, front-end assessment, or database challenge, CodeInterview provides the essential tools needed for effective evaluations.

Pricing:

• Standard Plan: $18 per user/month, providing full access to all core features.
• Enterprise Plan: Custom pricing for larger teams that require additional integrations and SSO support.

 

8. CodeBunk – Best for Simplicity and Speed

 

Pros:

• Simple, fast, and responsive real-time coding editor.
• Curated question bank streamlines the assessment process.
• Session recording and code playback offer insights into candidate performance.
• Supports 21 programming languages, making it versatile for many technical roles.

Cons:

• Free version is limited in session recording and advanced features.
• Might lack some advanced customization options needed by larger organizations.

Description:
CodeBunk is a straightforward and efficient Coding Interview Platform ideal for teams that value simplicity and speed. I love how it offers a fast, responsive real-time editor that minimizes setup time and lets you jump straight into the interview. Its curated question bank makes selecting coding challenges quick and ensures assessments are focused and effective.

The platform’s session recording and code playback features provide valuable insights into the candidate’s coding process. Supporting 21 programming languages, CodeBunk is flexible enough to handle various technical roles. Overall, it’s a cost-effective solution perfect for quick assessments without the overhead of more complex features.

Pricing:

• Free Version: Basic functionality with limited session recording, suitable for small-scale assessments.
• Pro Version: $15 per user/month, including access to an advanced question library and additional language support.
• Enterprise Options: Custom pricing available for larger teams with tailored features and support.

 

9. AlgoExpert – Best for Interview Preparation

 

Pros:

• Provides a curated library of 160 coding interview questions with comprehensive video explanations.
• Integrated coding workspace supports multiple languages for interactive practice.
• Offers detailed solutions including space-time complexity analyses and interview insights.

Cons:

• Primarily focused on self-preparation rather than live interviews.
• Subscription cost may be a barrier for some individuals or smaller teams.

Description:
AlgoExpert is a specialized platform designed to help software engineers prepare for technical interviews. I find its curated library of 160 coding questions—with two-part video explanations—particularly valuable. This format offers a deep understanding of each problem and step-by-step solutions, which strengthens problem-solving skills and builds a solid conceptual foundation.

Additionally, AlgoExpert’s integrated coding workspace supports multiple programming languages, giving users a realistic practice environment. The platform also provides detailed analyses of space and time complexity, along with practical interview insights to help avoid common pitfalls. For those serious about interview preparation, AlgoExpert is a comprehensive resource that bridges the gap between learning and real-world application.

Pricing:

• AlgoExpert Subscription: $99 per year for full access, including the Data Structures Crash Course and all 160 coding questions with video solutions.
• SystemsExpert Subscription: $79 per year for a system design course with 10 interview questions.
• Combined Bundle: $139 per year for access to both courses.

 

10. HireVue – Best for Enterprise-Level Assessments

 

Pros:

• Combines video interviewing with coding assessments for holistic candidate evaluation.
• Utilizes AI-powered assessments to reduce bias and improve hiring accuracy.
• Extensive language support and seamless enterprise integrations with ATS/HRIS systems.
• Offers detailed analytics, game-based assessments, and virtual job tryouts.

Cons:

• Pricing is geared toward larger organizations, making it less cost-effective for small teams.
• Advanced features may require significant onboarding and training.

Description:
HireVue is an enterprise-level platform that integrates video interviews, AI-driven assessments, and automation to streamline the recruitment process. I appreciate its comprehensive approach, which evaluates both technical and communication skills through a mix of live and on-demand video-enabled coding sessions combined with robust coding assessments. This holistic view provides a complete picture of a candidate’s abilities.

What really sets HireVue apart is its AI-powered assessment tool that minimizes bias while delivering detailed insights into candidate competencies. With support for many programming languages and smooth integration with ATS and HRIS systems, HireVue is perfect for high-volume hiring. Its additional features—like game-based assessments and virtual job tryouts—offer innovative ways to gauge candidate fit and performance.

Pricing:

• Essentials Package: Starting at $35,000 annually for organizations with 2,500 to 7,500 employees; includes live and on-demand video interviewing, custom branding, single language configuration, and 24/7 candidate support.
• Enterprise Package: Starting at $75,000 annually, offering advanced AI assessments and deeper integration capabilities for larger organizations.
• Premium Package: Custom pricing available for organizations with specialized needs.
  For the most accurate and up-to-date pricing, please consult HireVue’s official pricing page.

 

Quick Decision Guide for Choosing a Coding Interview Platform

For Startups and Small Businesses:

• Pramp:
  Free peer-to-peer mock interviews, allowing users to alternate roles as interviewer and interviewee. Ideal for practice and skill refinement without financial investment.
• CodeBunk:
  A simple, real-time code editor with session recording. Its straightforward interface makes it cost-effective and perfect for quick interviews in small teams.

For Medium to Large Enterprises:

• HackerRank:
  Offers comprehensive technical assessments with a vast challenge library. Supports a wide range of programming languages and provides detailed analytics and seamless ATS integrations for large-scale hiring.
• Codility:
  Specializes in screening and live coding interviews with CodeLive, offering automated assessments and extensive language support. Tailored for enterprise needs and collaborative problem-solving.
• HireVue:
  Combines video interviewing with AI-driven assessments, offering auto-scored evaluations and deep HR system integrations. Designed for high-volume, enterprise-level hiring processes.

For Real-World Coding Simulations:

• CodeInterview:
  Focuses on live collaborative coding with a real-time editor supporting multiple languages. Replay options and integrated communication tools make it ideal for assessing problem-solving skills.
• CoderPad:
  Provides a live coding environment that mirrors a full-featured IDE and supports over 30 programming languages. Features integrated video/audio and a drawing mode for system design interviews.

In Summary:
Choose a platform based on your organization’s size, budget, and specific hiring objectives—whether it’s cost-effective simplicity for startups or advanced, integrated features for larger enterprises.

Conclusion

Choosing the right Coding Interview Platform is all about matching your organization’s size, budget, and hiring goals—whether you need an affordable, simple solution like Pramp or CodeBunk for small teams, a robust, enterprise-grade option like HackerRank, Codility, or HireVue, or a tool that simulates real-world coding challenges like CodeInterview or CoderPad.